You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.
Javascript is disabled in your web browser. For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript.
This website is using cookies.
We use them to give you the best experience. If you continue using our website, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website.
x
conference cpote2026 logo
CPOTE2026 | 9th International Conference on
Contemporary Problems of Thermal Engineering
23-25 September 2026 | Kraków, Poland | In-person

Abstract CPOTE2026-12055-A

Geometry-aware neural network prediction of transient heat-transfer coefficients in fin-and-tube exchangers with leave-one-exchanger-out protocol validation

Tomasz CIEŚLIK, Cracov University of Technology, Poland
Mateusz MARCIŃKOWSKI, Cracow University of Technology, ul. Warszawska 24, 31-155, Cracow, Polan, Poland
Jan TALER, Cracow University of Technology, Poland
Dawid TALER, Cracow University of Technology, Poland

Predicting transient convective heat-transfer coefficients across different fin-and-tube heat exchangers is challenging due to domain shift in geometry and operating envelopes. We develop a two-step workflow. First, time-resolved air-side and water-side coefficients, αair (t)and αwater (t), are identified from air–water experiments using an energy-balance inverse model with a measurement-consistency filter. Second, multilayer perceptrons learn a surrogate mapping from measured operating variables to α(t)and are evaluated under a leave-one-exchanger-out protocol (LOHO). Geometry shift between exchangers is characterized using Mahalanobis and nearest-neighbour distances in the geometry-descriptor space. We report these distances for the held-out exchanger to contextualize out-of-distribution generalization. Across four input configurations, adding geometric descriptors reduces water-side error from ~4–5% to below 1% MAPE (mean absolute percentage error ) on the held-out exchanger. The best air-side models reach 5–7% MAPE (with R≈0.96"–" 0.97) and show partial attenuation of sharp peaks during fast transients. The results show that geometry is essential for transferable water-side prediction, while air-side accuracy is limited by stronger flow–fin interactions and effective label noise. The framework enables fast transient performance modelling and rigorous cross-exchanger validation.

Keywords: Energy, Computational fluid dynamics (CFD), Heat exchanger designs, Compact heat exchangers, Airflow velocity